Some of you certainly know the very entertaining Photoshop disasters website, where examples of extremely bad image manipulations are given. What I have found in the members area is not necessarily a disaster but at least something I find remarkable. Maybe it's just a wonder of nature.

What's it? Have a look at this hot Zuleidy photo story. The cumshot starts with the fifth last image:
(click to enlarge)
You can see that the dick starts squirting something that I would call a double-S-shaped cum trace. Now let's proceed to the next image:

You probably see that the cum trace didn't change its shape; since Zuleidy has changed her facial expression, I guess that at least a couple of seconds would lie between this and the shot before. There are also no spots of cum on her face or body, so the cum must have been magically congealed!

Now let's examine the next two shots:

Here the cum comes out horizontally, and again the cum trace keeps the same, although there must be a slight time difference between both shots, as a drop of cum comes out of Zuleidy's mouth which might take a second or two.

I'm not surprised to find manipulated images here, but I'm surprised about the obviousness of the manipulation. A bit sloppy, Private.

__________________
Join the Friends of Facials! The art of cumming! B2B - your business. Glamour! Tension!

MS

Yes I also noticed this poor and completely obvious image editing. I agree with you that its a poor job and somthing which should be avoided in future.

Cheers

AL

If you look closely you can even see that it's the same cum trace used four times (2 times horizontally, 2 times vertically)!

"What - a lame cumshot? Just a sec... Mask here, copy there, paste... voilÃ*. Nobody will note. Absolutely not, believe me!" :P

__________________
Join the Friends of Facials! The art of cumming! B2B - your business. Glamour! Tension!

An open and shut case, I think!

baskkk2003