![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi, I am a new member, but I was a member a few years ago. One of the reasons that I rejoined was for the magazine archives, but it seems that I can't seem to access any magazine older than 2003. The site advertized that I would have access to the archive going back to 1965. I am very disappointed.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi HammerTime,
We will be adding magazines to the member's area. We do have a private magazine archive since 1965. mermelade |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
You do still have an archive, but your members can no longer access it? And you will release the missing magazines, one by one, for years to come?
The new site is an appalling shame. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Merm,
I find your response insulting. Your site is advertising a magazine archive going back to 1965. When I paid for a full year membership, I expected to have access to this archive. If that is not false advertising, I don't know what is.... |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Hi there,
I would say: Call this fraud, or deception Woody |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
as I said to other thread:
we are preparing a surprise regarding magazines. soon you'll be able to have the full catalogue plus the original pictures in high resolution. please be patient! |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Howzit Wank
This is indeed good news. I'm trying to get old photos of stars we want to see back at private again and I am finding it to be a difficult task. Some of the early 90s stuff from Berth Jr is great. I'm trying to get more photos of Pierre"s flameTanya to post in the forum to support Grumps's post. cheers beach |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Could you give a time to the word soon. Days, weeks months, ....? Dutchy |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hate to say it but probably years going by past performance. Really do hope I will be prooved wrong!
__________________
I love shaved wet cunts |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
this will not happen in days though. we are scanning amazing pictures from the old days. the project we are developing right now will be unique and we are going to publish content that has never been online before. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Howzit Pornsters
As you can see in this thread it has been frustrating for pornsters and administrators alike with regards to Private's adjustment to the new challenges facing Private in the cumming years. I have had dialogue with an old pornster on these issues and that pornster tells me with words to the effect of that they have been disillusioned with Private for some time. Personally I can appreciate the pornsters frustration. I have expressed my comments of what has changed for the worse and what needs to change for the better in that discussion. Like all successful products Private is going through some rough times. The forum is one of the hearts of Private and we all need to be positive. It is not about right or wrong it is about the credibility of the delivery of the new Private product and the concerns of a loyal pornster responding to the problems of the changes of that product. I must say, from the considerable criticism from existing and past members, that Private does have some credibility issues only because it had to rush it's new changes. Issues of false advertising are a legitament criticism because Private were behind and rushed its product, moreso, if I can be as bold to say, out of panic, in response to the sharp reduction of the company's value. If Private were more honest about the difficuties of change, in my view, the backlash and cynicism from members would not have been as great. I invite Private to put trust back into its membership; to listen and respect the concerns and needs of loyal pornsters so that we can all enjoy a new vision together kind regards beach Last edited by beachy; 08-12-2010 at 01:43 PM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
@beachy
Hello beachy, why we have to be positive? Private doesnīt. Iīm a member of private paysite. No updates on magazines since weeks (every day a new magazine - what a lie!), only updates movies (no hd) and pics. No admin here, who give answers (only wishy-washy) about timeline. Itīs a shame. regards lex harker |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
1 new magazine update from the archives a day?
I haven't spotted a single one. Please point them out. More to the point, get your thumbs out of your arses and provide the service we paid for. Yours, a loyal and adoring fan. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
@Wanker
Nice to hear that you are working. But I bought a three month membership mainly because of the statement of the archive of magazines _available_ Do I get something of the service advertised and paid or should I come back in three _years_ to get the service I paid for this time? Just some rough time frame. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
You still haven't answer my question from two months ago. When can we expect the promised magazines and original pictures? Private promised us a daily update with magazines, when the new site was launched. Since then there wasn't a magazine update at all. I think it's time for action!! Regards Dutchy |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
@Dutchy
no answers, no support - here is nothing. enough is enough. bad shop, bad paysite - private is dead. itīs a shame. Regards Lex Harker |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
@all members,
itīs a wonder - magazines updatet. i hope itīs not the last. regards lex harker Bad joke - after this update in magazines - nothing. Never join again - good bye. Last edited by Lex Harker; 04-24-2011 at 11:01 PM. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's not just the archive, what about recent editions?
The web used to be one edition behind the hardcopies in the shops. Private nos 219 and 220 (if not more) are on sale, but we have nothing ater 218 on the site. When will 219 / 220 etc be loaded onto the site? TT
__________________
I'm loving it |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|